GeofyleROI model • design partner
Concept only. A modeling tool for one real workflow. Use your own observed numbers; it stores nothing and is separate from operational Geofyle.

Model one real workflow.

Observed numbers on the left; the estimate on the right is arithmetic on them — a projection, not measured savings. It separates the two real admin costs: filing records, and finding them again later.

What you enter

Observed

From one real workflow — measured, not guessed.

40
Across the whole team.
$28
Filing & organizing
2.5
Identifying, naming, and filing today vs. with Geofyle.
Finding it again later
4.0
Time to locate a record when someone needs it.
1.5
How often a record gets pulled up after filing.
Conservatism
80%
Only count records that actually run through Geofyle.

What the model estimates

Derived

A projection from your inputs — not realized savings.

$—
estimated labor saved per year
Filing  ——  Finding
/ week
—
/ month
—
hrs / yr
—

The bigger risk — a missed record

Filing time is the smaller cost. The one that hurts is a required record that never gets made — and can't be recreated later. Use your own number.

$250
A failed-audit finding, a rejected load, rework, a dispute — whatever it means here.
1
How many misses Geofyle helps catch in time. Start conservative.
Each one caught back is worth
$250
At that rate, on top of the time saved
$3,000 / year

Illustrative, from your own inputs — not a guarantee, and not a claim of realized savings. It counts only what you set a missed record to be worth.

Counts only documented admin time — filing records and finding them again later — and only for the share of records that actually run through Geofyle (the adoption dial). An illustration from your inputs — not a guarantee or a claim of realized savings. Geofyle is in controlled testing, not public release.

← Back to Design Partner Preview